04-19-2003, 04:28 PM
Quote:Sorry, was that for me? I have still not grown accustomed to Threaded...er, threads, so if I make a mistake with one of my replies, I apologize profusely.
*points above* That's a quote, taken from the post that I'm replying to. I forgot to mention in my previous post that this is ANOTHER useful tool in keeping some level of consistency in the conversation as well. Not as powerful as the Threaded view in my opinion, but useful nonetheless.
No, Fenris... my reply was not towards you. Look at the threaded view and see where my reply falls in:
* Post Number 1
|
|_ * Post Number 2
Post Number 2 is replying to Post Number 1, neh?
* Post Number 1
|
|_ * Post Number 2
| |
| |_ * Post Number 3
|
|_ *Post Number 4
Post Number 3 replies to number 2. Number 2 to Number 1. Number 4 also replies to Number 1.
This isn't Rocket Science, team.
Garnered Wisdom --
If it has more than four legs, kill it immediately.
Never hesitate to put another bullet into the skull of the movie's main villain; it'll save time on the denouement.
Eight hours per day of children's TV programming can reduce a grown man to tears -- PM me for details.
If it has more than four legs, kill it immediately.
Never hesitate to put another bullet into the skull of the movie's main villain; it'll save time on the denouement.
Eight hours per day of children's TV programming can reduce a grown man to tears -- PM me for details.