patch 2.0.10 notes on the PTR

[ima_nerd]

Except you'll still bring a DPS warrior. I haven't seen any indication anywhere that DPS warriors' raid spots are in danger due to Feral druids.

If the DPS warrior tanks as well as the Feral druid (without having any points in Protection), there's no need to bring the Feral druid--especially if you can replace two support healers by having him spec a full Restoration spec, and replace the second support-healer with a DPS class. It covers just about any flexibility the Feral druid would bring.

Again, you're mixing apples and oranges. DPS Warrior spots are in danger from Rogues. An OT position (emphasis orly?) is what I'm discussing. A Feral Druid is the clear choice for an OT. The Feral Druid can do everything the DPS Warrior can and more.

Note: I was saying "DPS Warrior" merely to not have to type out "Arms/Fury Warrior":PI was still referring to an OT position, not a DPS position. Sorry for any resulting confusion.

They more than merit a DPS spot, plus they bring their own versatility.

Utility? I don't think anyone can succesfully argue that an Arms/Fury Warrior brings anywhere near the utility that a Feral Druid does. And the DPS difference? Puh-lease. The DPS loss from a Feral Druid is, I wager, made up with LotP. Throw a Rogue in the Druid's group and bam, the DPS difference is gone. If not made up, made so inconsequential, that the utility the Druid brings makes Arms/Fury Warriors as top OT choice a thing of the past.