01-11-2006, 05:40 PM
Raelynn,Jan 11 2006, 04:20 PM Wrote:There finally was a post that said they didn't catch this due to a different type of QA they used in order to get this patch out as quick as possible. They're working on a fix for it.
[right][snapback]99143[/snapback][/right]
Hopefully they'll use the original type of QA on it, rather than this "different" type, which I propose be renamed "crap" or "non-existent". Honestly, how do you _not_ catch something like that?
You don't know what you're talking about.