11-04-2004, 07:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-04-2004, 07:52 PM by Chaerophon.)
Quote:With them at the helm the Democratic party is not Democratic, but a Leninist party and we all know how well that ended up.
First of all, you don't really know what a Leninist is. Look it up... Then proceed to kick your own ass.
Is anything Left of Bush Leninist? Or is the middle somewhere in between... If that's the case, then I suppose we should be hailing Bush as a fascist. To tell the truth, he's probably closer to that than Kerry is to being a Leninist. In the grand scheme of the 'radical to reactionary spectrum', he's quite a ways to the right what with his legislating morality, blind faith in laissez-faire and militarist tendencies. The Democrats are much closer to the middle. As I've said in another thread, the Democrats are right of center on the basis of their economic and social policies in most other "developed democracies" in the world. With all of that being said, I'll refrain from labelling Bush as such, because, well, he isn't a fascist. Maybe that kind of labelling works where you come from. Most on the Lounge know enough just to shake their head at that kind of backwater rhetoric.
That being said, if you think that you can explain to me how the Democrats or even their free enterprise liberal Hollywood backers are, in fact, Leninist, then by all means, give it a try. Something tells me that you won't do that.
But whate'er I be,
Nor I, nor any man that is,
With nothing shall be pleased till he be eased
With being nothing.
William Shakespeare - Richard II
Nor I, nor any man that is,
With nothing shall be pleased till he be eased
With being nothing.
William Shakespeare - Richard II