What's so hot about Enchant

[LemmingofGlory]

But if a hack, something that isn't an item, specifically a trainer, can cancel purist status, then simmiliarly an action that gives advantages beyond the normal scope of a character, like an item would, could be concidered a twink.

Disconnected logic. Allow me to re-phrase you.

If a character cheats it is not a purist (because trainers provide an outside advantage).
It follows that any character gaining an outside advantage is not a purist.
Therefore these characters are twinks.

Your conclusion has nothing to do with your first or second statement because you didn't mention twinking at all, only non-purism. (You didn't say non-purism == twinking.)

If you'd phrased it thusly:

A cheater is a twink because it gains outside advantages.
A character can gain an outside advantage through means other than cheating.
Therefore any character gaining an outside advantage is a twink.

Then you could use that conclusion. But it would be invalid unless you defined twinking as "Any character gaining an outside advantage." So, essentially, you don't even need to go into the reasoning. You just need to define twink.

Now, I do not see any point whatsoever in subdividing cheaters into pure/non-pure. I define purist as a label that applies only to legit characters. Therefore, when one asks "Is a cheater a purist?" I say, "No, because 'pure' is defined only for legitimate characters."

[o: *LEMMING* :o]