02-03-2005, 01:00 AM
I can hold aggro, as a warrior, without using taunt or using sunder, if my comrades know how to focus fire and control their aggro. It's tricky to do - And generally not worth while - But I would imagine it can be done.
As long as your party is focusing fire, generating hate on ONE target to keep it locked isn't hard. The real trouble lies with the healer and the hate heals generate. EVERYTHING soundly hates on the healer, and that's the trouble. That's a problem I haven't figure out yet, so I invariably get back to ye old taunt and sunder.
Probably doable, but I'd get a warrior for the tough instances.
As long as your party is focusing fire, generating hate on ONE target to keep it locked isn't hard. The real trouble lies with the healer and the hate heals generate. EVERYTHING soundly hates on the healer, and that's the trouble. That's a problem I haven't figure out yet, so I invariably get back to ye old taunt and sunder.
Probably doable, but I'd get a warrior for the tough instances.
Artega,Feb 2 2005, 08:44 PM Wrote:Do Pallies not heal when they're tanking? It would seem that they should, or they'd just seem like gimp Warriors :unsure:I can't figure out why they wouldn't. Heals are such a great way to generate aggro, why I daresay that could practically serve as the paladin taunt!
[right][snapback]67003[/snapback][/right]
My other mount is a Spiderdrake