06-23-2003, 03:30 PM
Brista,Jun 23 2003, 01:12 AM Wrote:It seems quite sensible to me. I also read for a long time before I posted but I can't imagine many new people having something so burningly urgent that they couldn't wait a couple of days - I know I didn't ;)I too Lurked for a long time before my first post.
In general, I also agree that there is very little that is so burningly urgent that a response has to be made right away. Very often, while I mull over what to post, the issue is already addressed by someone else in more detail and with more accuracy than I could have provided anyway. :rolleyes: And when it is a matter of opinion, as opposed to fact, there is no hurry whatsoever to providing it.
As to dabea93's question: If you Lurked for months before posting, what real cost could there be for a further three days of waiting?
And you may call it righteousness
When civility survives,
But I've had dinner with the Devil and
I know nice from right.
From Dinner with the Devil, by Big Rude Jake
When civility survives,
But I've had dinner with the Devil and
I know nice from right.
From Dinner with the Devil, by Big Rude Jake