07-12-2006, 08:12 PM
Quote:I think Blizzard will need to go back and revisit some of the classes though. For Warriors, Arms and Fury are very well layed out, but Protection still has some glaring holes that need to be remedied.No more "class reviews", please. Just tweak a class here and there. Prot could use something, yes.
Quote:...and they need to add in a talent somewhere to decrease threat for Warlocks since that is now the biggest obstacle to Warlock DPS in raids...Won't disagree, but it appears Blizzard is realizing they stressed aggro too hard in BWL. Most of what I've seen/heard post-BWL involves aggro being wiped/reduced on everyone, thus being a Ragnaros-like state for all instead of just melee.
Quote:Blizzard really does need to go back and relook at Protection for the Paladins.Agreed. It's a tree that's supposed to mainly benefit tanking, yet they don't want Paladins to effectively tank (endgame). That's a conundrum.
Quote:Mage seems to be love/hate. You either have Mages absolutely loving the changes made to the Mage talents or loathing them greatly. There doesn't seem to be a real middle ground between Mage players on the talents.Once past the initial, semi-complete, review ... I think it was great. Only problems are small things in Arcane and the aggro talents should be multiplicative, not additive
Quote:When it comes to Hunters, Beastmaster hunters are kinda left out in the cold for raiding.I'm okay with some trees not being up to spec for raiding, as long as they have their uses somewhere.
Quote:Druid would require minor tweaks to a couple talents, but they're done for all practical purposes. I think Priests are in the same boat, couple talents could use tweaks, but they're done.Anyone could use a tweak here or there.
Trade yourself in for the perfect one. No one needs to know that you feel you've been ruined!