10-28-2006, 12:19 AM
Quote:What I'm trying to say is: If I were to continue my translation after you released an update, I'd have to do everything over again!
Unless, of course, you (or Pete) included a list of changes made, and there really were no undocumented changes, so that I wouldn't have to alter much.
There's (probably) no need to do that. Even if Jarulf does not have a changelog, it's not too hard to generate a list of differences between two versions. This would have the added consequence of catching all changes (e.g. typographic fixes) which might not otherwise be documented due to being too insignificant. Once such a list was generated (consult your local Unix guru if need be), you could refer to the list to find the places you would need to retranslate.
Something along the lines of:
Save v1.62 as HTML.
Save v1.63 as HTML.
diff -bu jarulf162.html jarulf163.html > changes.diff
There may be some spurious changes from HTML reformatting, but it should not be too bad. Once the diff list is generated, convert the line numbers in the HTML to page references and you are ready to go.