05-23-2003, 02:32 AM
so it ignores twohandedwclass param. how logical... <_< i wonder why the favoritism towards swords.
can i simulate something two targets for a definitive clarification? using what you wrote:
scenario 1
default weapon = left
calculate next delay (based on default weapon)
found target 1 in range
attack target 1
switch weapons (default weapon = right)
calculate next delay (based on default weapon)
found target 2 in range
attack target 2
switch weapons (default weapon = left)
calculate next delay (based on default weapon)
found target-x in range
attack target-x
etc, etc...
scenario 2
default weapon = left
calculate next delay (based on default weapon)
found target 1 in range
attack target 1
switch weapons (weapon = right)
found target 2 in range
attack target 2
switch weapons (default weapon = right)
calculate next delay (based on default weapon = right)
found target-x in range
attack target-x
switch weapons (weapon = left)
found target-x in range
attack target-x
etc, etc...
which scenario is the correct one?
thanks!
can i simulate something two targets for a definitive clarification? using what you wrote:
scenario 1
default weapon = left
calculate next delay (based on default weapon)
found target 1 in range
attack target 1
switch weapons (default weapon = right)
calculate next delay (based on default weapon)
found target 2 in range
attack target 2
switch weapons (default weapon = left)
calculate next delay (based on default weapon)
found target-x in range
attack target-x
etc, etc...
scenario 2
default weapon = left
calculate next delay (based on default weapon)
found target 1 in range
attack target 1
switch weapons (weapon = right)
found target 2 in range
attack target 2
switch weapons (default weapon = right)
calculate next delay (based on default weapon = right)
found target-x in range
attack target-x
switch weapons (weapon = left)
found target-x in range
attack target-x
etc, etc...
which scenario is the correct one?
thanks!