Ashock,Aug 31 2005, 10:35 AM Wrote:Let me be more direct here. I do not mind violence, I even like it. However, this was horribly rediculous and unrealistic violence. Now, I understand that this was sort of meant as a tribute to movies of this genre. Well, Elvis impersonators aren't really Elvis, are they?I'm hyper-analytical by nature and profession, so ALL movies are somewhat unrealistic to me. But, some of my favorite movies cross far from reality into campy, or ludicrous. :D I absolutely love the movie Big Trouble in Little China on many levels, but most people just don't get it. I have to stop myself from thinking about, for example, how a car would really explode. I'm pleasantly surprised when I see a movie scene that is somewhat realistic, for example, the epic gun battle in the movie Heat using special forces gun and run tactics.
-A
[right][snapback]87782[/snapback][/right]
So, if we examine just the sword fight in the bar with the Crazy 88's, I appreciated it from the genre nod to Kung-Fu theatre with the stylization of Kato from the Green Hornet. That scene was horrific, tedious, outrageous, deliciously cathartic, and lightly salted with humor. Other than the gore factor I think it worked for many people, and without the gore it would have been even more a farce. You can watch that scene and see Tarentino grinning with glee during the dailys.
But, for this movie I find myself asking at what point does Tarentino just do Tarentino rather than try to weave the styles of the Shaw Bros, De Palma, Lucio Fulci, Chang-Che, Sergio Leone, Kurosawa, Zhang Yimou and Busby Berkeley. So, artistic masturbation? Yes, but that seems to be the quintessential Tarentino.