Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures

[jahcs]

But Jahcs, that's not the dividing line in Kelo at all.

...

The question in Kelo was whether the public use requirement of the takings clause included economic development, not whether or not taken property could be given to another private recipient.
[right][snapback]82006[/snapback][/right]

Right. The issue as cast was whether economic development was just cause for excercise of eminent domain. Public Use and Public Benefit are being confused by the court, IMHO. I have brought this up numerous times.