06-25-2005, 12:41 AM
Something I forgot in the beginning: I heard that some people were expecting easier passings of these types of laws thanks to the war going on, and I think something about "support the troops" was in there. I think similarly to my post on the "atention whores" about the "ssupport the troops". Sure, when the country sends the military into an area, they don't send people in and not support them with supplies and things. Howeve,r Again I say that supporting the troops for one watr is no reason to make long term changes in laws and/or constitutional changes that will last much longer than the war that's getting fought. I have other things to say about this line of arguing but that would go way beyond the flag stuff and I don't feel like starting another thread.
I may be dead, but I'm not old (source: see lavcat)
The gloves come off, I'm playing hardball. It's fourth and 15 and you're looking at a full-court press. (Frank Drebin in The Naked Gun)
Some people in forums do the next best thing to listening to themselves talk, writing and reading what they write (source, my brother)
The gloves come off, I'm playing hardball. It's fourth and 15 and you're looking at a full-court press. (Frank Drebin in The Naked Gun)
Some people in forums do the next best thing to listening to themselves talk, writing and reading what they write (source, my brother)