06-05-2005, 08:33 PM
Doc,Jun 5 2005, 01:16 PM Wrote:Actually, that is not entirely true.
The Celts were never completely brought under domination by the Romans, and the Romans fell into decline shortly thereafter.
[right][snapback]79775[/snapback][/right]
Caeser 50ish BC, took Gaul and Britain. Around 300ish AD, Rome began to recede.
"Shortly thereafter" is a century longer than America has been around. :lol: Give the Celts credit, thought, they hung onto their core nature pretty well, and doubtless changed the occupying Romans and much as the occupying Romans changed them.
Occhi
Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the Men 'O War!
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete