This world is not ours

[Doc]

A suggestion:

1.) type "design argument" into google.

2.) read and realize that what you are producing, if it is original thought at all, is incoherent crap.

3.) read up.  This is how real philosophers think.

4.) ponder. 

5.) think some more.

6.) post if you think that you can make a decent argument.

It would be fine if you had realized that your original post fell short of its intent.  In fact, I couldn't even finish it, as it was absolutely riddled with untested assumptions and incoherent statments.  Unfortunately, you insist on pushing the issue.  Until you understand what real philosophy looks like, I fear that you will continue to make an ass of yourself.
[right][snapback]77772[/snapback][/right]

You mean to tell me that philosophy has fallen into using it's looks like some cheap harlot? Why, that crusty old bitch can't possibly get by on her looks...

So tell me, what look is in this year for philosophy? Or shall we just call her Sophie... Would the Nihlistic Goth statement be fashionable and hip, or something, I dunno, something grand and steeped in tradition... Like capitialism and consumerism and the mindsets involved? We could dress her up like the great ol' Whore of Babylon. Oh look! Bulls on parade! Now with stylish consumption obcessed attention whores riding bareback. Or is that bear back? Would the Whore of Babylon do business with both the bulls and the bears? Did I just open a can of worms?

Brazen hussy... I know what real Philosophy looks like... She damn sure aint a blonde... That's artificial stupidity right there, the curtains don't match the carpet. She's a redhead, and let me tell you, nothing out does the coppercrotch.

What? Why is everybody staring at me?