The Fools Strike Again

[Raelynn]

As is religion, and no churches, ministers, rules or ceremonies are needed. Faith is all that is required. "Faith manages." (My opinion, not fact (should there have been any doubt :P).)
[right][snapback]76718[/snapback][/right]

This is truely how I feel about religion. I see no reason other than the politics of the organizations to require things out of the members beyond faith. I have a certain religious frame of mind, but in the end, I feel that anyone, as long as they feel they tried hard to not intentionally go against their own beliefs (granted these beliefs must have some basis in accepted morals and laws) has been faithful and deserves whatever g ood may come in the afterlife. Whether or not an afterlife exists is an entirely different subject that is not the topic of discussion.

My own religion for some time has been just me adhering to my own defined morals and doctrines which take into account a wide variety of beliefs basically handpicked from the many religions around the world. Each has various strong points, but none have truely given me "The Answer™". All in all I feel religion is best defined individually given a person's own experiences and beliefs. No one can truely tell you what is correct concerning this.

If you want some other interesting ideas I have, ask me my beliefs on morals. That got me into a bunch of arguements in my philosophy and religion classes ;)