04-02-2003, 06:31 PM
Quote:What is wrong with FHM magazine? I don't consider it a good reference manual, but it has its place.
Besides remaining on the stands, what exactly would that "place" be?
Take this month's offering: The most "timely" article would be Kim Cattrel interview, which they seem to want to indicate they needed more justification for her taking off her shirt.
Along with their other inane questions, including having her sing the first three lines of the Canadian national anthem (correcting her wrongly, I might add), they then ask her opinion on what Canada's greatest contribution to the world has been.
She replies, "Pierre Elliot Trudeau". To which this interview asks, "And that would be who?"
Yeah, really cutting-edge journalism, there.
FHM can try to be Playboy... but in the end they are a bastard child of Playboy and GQ: the result of which is lude articles that occupy the space between their advertisements.
Garnered Wisdom --
If it has more than four legs, kill it immediately.
Never hesitate to put another bullet into the skull of the movie's main villain; it'll save time on the denouement.
Eight hours per day of children's TV programming can reduce a grown man to tears -- PM me for details.
If it has more than four legs, kill it immediately.
Never hesitate to put another bullet into the skull of the movie's main villain; it'll save time on the denouement.
Eight hours per day of children's TV programming can reduce a grown man to tears -- PM me for details.