Norway Killer gets 21-Years

[FireIceTalon]

I don't do cocaine. But regardless, this retort is basically a concession either I am right, or you have no legitimate argument other than logical fallacies and sarcastic remarks to try and back up your weakly constructed, and presumptuous claims. Or more likely, both.

Let me be honest here. You, my fellow Diablo 3 disliker (I just made that term up, like it?), are in need of serious life therapy. As such, I can't really argue with you, just as I do not argue with small children, drunks, the very old or the mentally insane.

Just think about this. Just the thought that you are posting what you posting without being killed, and having everyone you know and hold dear killed, means you know jack about communism.

Enjoy your delusions, it is easier that way. I'm done with this.

ps. Oh sure, you can claim that as I'm backing out of this discussion, means I have no valid argument.
I don't really care.

pps. Any of the admins feel that I am making a personal attack with my initial comment? I also don't care.

ppps. Time to go home. This, I do care about.

So you are a psychologist now? It is you who is delusional

It is probably safe to say that most of us need or have needed some sort of therapy for some reason or another at some point in time, so what is your point? I think this is just more your short-sighted rhetoric. Be as it may, I don't think I need therapy at this time. I think you just need to stop watching Faux News so much and stop believing everything the little propaganda machine spits your way. But then again, to hell with thinking critically right? Ignorance is bliss.

My knowledge of Communism has no relationship to the fact I am or can post my thoughts about it without being killed, or to the well being of those I hold dear. Your argument is a complete red-herring. And not to sound arrogant, but I know and understand more about Communism and the origin of radical leftist thought than you and everyone else who posts on this forum COMBINED. Fact.

And admins, I don't care if his initial comment is a personal attack against me either. That's just a further sign that he is defeated and knows I will DESTROY him in any intellectual or sociological debate. The first person who has to resort to ad-hominem attacks in a debate, loses that debate by default. Id give him some credit though if he showed his face in this thread again, after the ass-whooping I just gave him.