Did Bush manipulate Iraq data?

[Growler]

Better facts? Any facts presented are entirely beside the point assuming the were any.

You lost me here. Its all about the facts.

I need to explain how big viewscreens spouting stuff like "Iraq: Failure to disarm," and all the other rubbish lost the target audience almost immediately? No thanks. Some people might get the picture, but if I have to explain how that presentation was barely above the level of insult, then I suspect you just won't get the point.

Here you are criticizing the style not the substance of the presentation. I don't know why the format of the presentation should matter. Perhaps we should blame Microsoft for increasing international discord by inventing PowerPoint? There was a time I considered PowerPoint presentations insulting due to their early misuse, but I have had to learn to live with them. They are quite popular in business and gov't here in America. They can be used to inform but they are insulting when you feel you are being propagandized, lied to. If you know the facts on the screen are false that is legitimate, but otherwise how do you know you are being lied to? How can you tell?

So you haven't given a good reason yet.