Quote:First off: glad you have (once again) broken your angry vow never to reply to my posts ever again.
Second: Basic aspects of sex education is what Obama was advocating for kindergarteners. By this, he apparently means things like appropriate vs. innapropriate touches, or whether people should be allowed to take naked picutres of you. Since that is non-zero sex education, Romney objected to Obama's support for this education, arguing that the correct number is zero. I think that is ridiculous.
How is that 'stretching'?
-Jester
Sex education and where not to touch children are not the same thing. How is "Don't let anyone touch you here and here" sex education? "Apparently" means? How do you know what he "apparently means"? After quickly scanning the article I did not see anywhere where it said that Romney was against telling kids about not letting people touch them in inappropriate places or taking pictures of this type. Either way, even if he did say he was against that also, this is not sex education anyway. This is life education. But he did not say this anyway, so it's a small matter.
As far as not replying to you, let me be honest here. I frankly forgot if you were on my list or not since it's been a while since I posted in any of these threads. I was not sure and I actually thought about it. There are umm.... 5-6 people that I am 100% sure of that I do not reply to for various reasons. I was not 100% sure about you as you lack any sort of distinctness for me as far as my reasons for not replying. However, thanks for the reminder. My mistake. Corrected.