Redundant terminology

[Chaerophon]

Listen, in many, PRIVATE circles, the joke is considered funny. However, I've worked extensively with the handicapped at a school level and some of the most inspiring people that I have ever met were "retarded" in one way or another and while at one time, when I was quite a bit younger, I would have laughed. I don't find it particularly funny anymore and even at the time, I wouldn't have tried to argue that the joke wasn't hurtful or insensitive.

On certain levels, as you argue, the joke contains an element of truth - winning at the special olympics is like being the best among "substandard" competition. However, if you understood how hard these people have worked and the struggles and trials that they have undergone in order to be where they are, maybe you would understand the upheaval a bit better. The joke IS insensitive and not particularly well suited to a PUBLIC forum where many may be offended by its content. I am not "offended", per se; however, I understand why others are, and a simple maxim applies. If you don't want to get burned (flamed even), don't play with fire.

You can't possibly argue that the joke is inoffensive, that is the root of its "humour". It's somewhat shocking and intended to belittle the handicapped. You should stop trying, simply state that you find it humourous on the surface but acknowledge that it lacks sensitivity and is even cruel and belittling. Many jokes are. You'd probably still offend some people, but at least they would respect your manner of dealing with the issue.