the Diablo History is not dead yet!
#8
Hi Pirengle,
There is a minor correction to be made in your timeline. "Claudio founds a legit Diablo guild based in Germany called (in English) the Brotherhood of the White Oak." should read, "Yumek@ge[BWO] founds a legit Diablo guild...." Cat made a nice homepage for BWO, but he was not the founder as you can see in the members listing.

The posts that Pete "translated" for you will be easily digestible, but the teleported posts will give you quite a headache, I believe. Have fun getting the links to work -).
Xi
Reply


Messages In This Thread
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by --Pete - 05-22-2003, 02:32 AM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by LavCat - 05-22-2003, 05:49 AM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Bob - 05-22-2003, 07:10 AM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Feryar - 05-22-2003, 10:04 AM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Walkiry - 05-22-2003, 10:43 AM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Xiuhcoatl - 05-22-2003, 10:44 AM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by TaMeOlta - 05-22-2003, 03:38 PM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Nystul - 05-22-2003, 03:53 PM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Roland - 05-22-2003, 10:44 PM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Mirajj - 05-22-2003, 11:42 PM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Roland - 05-22-2003, 11:59 PM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Roland - 05-23-2003, 12:00 AM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Nystul - 05-23-2003, 12:03 AM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Kasreyn - 05-23-2003, 08:47 PM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by Roland - 05-23-2003, 10:47 PM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by --Pete - 05-23-2003, 11:54 PM
the Diablo History is not dead yet! - by DeeBye - 05-24-2003, 03:15 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)