06-01-2006, 09:49 PM
Well that information is old. The mages int rate has been known a long time.
What is new is the information for other classes.
Tseric:
Not exactly, but the numbers tend to hover around that mark for many casters, at least. Obviously, for melee the numbers are somewhat irrelevant. Sorry that I don't have the exact numbers for Paladins, but the trend is illustrated. Here are some other numbers to that end:
At level 60, these are expected numbers of INT and points per Crit%
Warlock 200 - 60.6
Druid 192 - 60
Shaman 160 - 59.2
Priest 250 - 59.5
What is strange is that the expected int values differ so strongly, yet the chosen value for int/crit is pratically same. And still they didn't use the same value. Strange, almost looks like a result from a different formula.
What is new is the information for other classes.
Tseric:
Not exactly, but the numbers tend to hover around that mark for many casters, at least. Obviously, for melee the numbers are somewhat irrelevant. Sorry that I don't have the exact numbers for Paladins, but the trend is illustrated. Here are some other numbers to that end:
At level 60, these are expected numbers of INT and points per Crit%
Warlock 200 - 60.6
Druid 192 - 60
Shaman 160 - 59.2
Priest 250 - 59.5
What is strange is that the expected int values differ so strongly, yet the chosen value for int/crit is pratically same. And still they didn't use the same value. Strange, almost looks like a result from a different formula.