Doc,Mar 8 2006, 08:57 PM Wrote:Words do not explain.
I just don't know what to say about this... Except there is some sort of logic to it.
[right][snapback]103969[/snapback][/right]
After reading the article, its all a bunch of hot air. It reminds me of other publicity stupidity, like the 18 year old that filed a lawsuit against his high school - which said that the High School was 'obviously biased against males' since it enforced rules upon its students, the rules which 'females naturally follow, and men naturally defy'.
I have a question for the rest of the LL members, since my understanding of adoption laws is lacking. In a sidecomment, Mr. Feit said a woman can put her child up for adoption under the pretense she can not afford to take care of her child, which implying men should be able to 'give up' the rights too. But doesn't adoption require both parents to sign over custody of the child?
Cheers,
Munk
Edit: Fixed a few minor mistakes