01-24-2006, 06:43 PM
vor_lord,Jan 24 2006, 08:12 AM Wrote:Seeing as we're the only users of the lurkerlounge teamspeak server we'd be the ones to suffer if we let the password out to some wanker (it's been ages since I've heard that word -- reminds me of when I lived in England). But I'll check with Bolty. If he's not keen on it we can always run our own like we were before if we have to.
[right][snapback]100002[/snapback][/right]
Wanker was used due to the usage of the term in the "Welcome to the LL: WoW edition" post by MJ, linking to this site:Don't Write Like a Wanker
Bolty's server is much more capable than mine (as mine is on a 384k up DSL line), and has a larger potential user base. We should probably avoid exposing it when we don't need to. We can use mine for testing out new members or potential alliances in small groups (5-15 man runs). Many fewer people need to be informed if my server password needs changing. I currently have it capped at 10 users, but never really tested performance when full. Theoretically that will soak up a max of ~185k with a 16.4k codec and 10 users, which leaves plenty of room for my own WoW bits to move around. It's possible 15 would still be okay, but if not we could move down to a 12.x codec, which is still decent quality, and stay around the same overall bandwidth usage.
Conc / Concillian -- Vintage player of many games. Deadly leader of the All Pally Team (or was it Death leader?)
Terenas WoW player... while we waited for Diablo III.
And it came... and it went... and I played Hearthstone longer than Diablo III.
Terenas WoW player... while we waited for Diablo III.
And it came... and it went... and I played Hearthstone longer than Diablo III.