12-05-2005, 08:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-05-2005, 08:55 PM by Occhidiangela.)
SwissMercenary,Dec 5 2005, 01:43 PM Wrote:To get back on-topic, Stephen Harper's campaign is, so far, brilliant. At least the ideas make sense. Until you start adding them up, and wondering where he'll get the money to pay for them. :whistling:
It is not so hard to come up with a good idea; it is a real bear to implement one, to implement change. The larger the organization you are trying to implement it in, the tougher it is.
Quote:At least his ideas are quasi-original. You have to give credit for that, considering that the NDP keep prattling on about healthcare :rolleyes: , and the BQ is doing what the BQ does best... Refining their seperatist agenda, or somesuch, which taken into scale with various other federal issues amounts to just about nothing. I don't know.
Paul Martin's of course got his hands full trying to play defense.
So... What interests me the most is: "Can Harper keep this rather brilliant start up for the next 50 days?"
After those 50 days, would he, assuming he won this latest scuffle, implement these quasi good ideas, or would he do as most pols do and reneg on campaign promises? Is the vision a chimera?
Folks won't know until the new elections are over, after which point it is too late, eh? :whistling:
Occhi
EDITED for missing the Preview button. No wonder I stink at PvP on a computer.
Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the Men 'O War!
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete