08-25-2005, 07:40 PM
Imagine loot being awarded by popularity - that is, how much the raid likes you. Hunter loot drops - vote on which hunter gets it!
You wouldn't like that so much, right? Unfair, discriminatory, leads to imbalance because some people just get along better than others?
So why is it any better if a council does it?
Not that I specifically object to a loot council; I think for instance that it's just fine if the tranq shot from Lucifron is allocated to a chosen hunter, because that is raid-required loot, but other than that, I think that people fear they will now need to work on cultivating the judges and putting on a good show of cameraderie in order to maximize their loot, rather than just doing their bit in a raid.
You wouldn't like that so much, right? Unfair, discriminatory, leads to imbalance because some people just get along better than others?
So why is it any better if a council does it?
Not that I specifically object to a loot council; I think for instance that it's just fine if the tranq shot from Lucifron is allocated to a chosen hunter, because that is raid-required loot, but other than that, I think that people fear they will now need to work on cultivating the judges and putting on a good show of cameraderie in order to maximize their loot, rather than just doing their bit in a raid.