Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures
#25
IMHO I believe the flag issue deserves it's own thread.

To get this back on track...

Here is some new info I learned:

Quote:Susette Kelo dreamed of owning a home that looked out over the water. She purchased and lovingly restored her little pink house where the Thames River meets the Long Island Sound in 1997, and has enjoyed the great view from its windows ever since. The Dery family, down the street from Susette, has lived in Fort Trumbull since 1895; Matt Dery and his family live next door to his mother and father, whose parents purchased their house when William McKinley was president. The richness and vibrancy of this neighborhood reflects the American ideal of community and the dream of homeownership.

Tragically, the City of New London is turning that dream into a nightmare.

In 1998, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer built a plant next to Fort Trumbull and the City determined that someone else could make better use of the land than the Fort Trumbull residents. The City handed over its power of eminent domain—the ability to take private property for public use—to the New London Development Corporation (NLDC), a private body, to take the entire neighborhood for private development. As the Fort Trumbull neighbors found out, when private entities wield government’s awesome power of eminent domain and can justify taking property with the nebulous claim of “economic development,” all homeowners are in trouble.

Apparently the city turned over it's power of eminent domain to a PRIVATE COMPANY. The stew thickens...

This screams corruption, incompetence, and conflict of interest.

PUBLIC USE does not mean PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT TO GENERATE TAX REVENUE.
The Bill of No Rights
The United States has become a place where entertainers and professional athletes are mistaken for people of importance. Robert A. Heinlein
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by jahcs - 06-23-2005, 07:25 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-23-2005, 09:23 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-23-2005, 10:02 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Any1 - 06-23-2005, 11:28 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-23-2005, 11:58 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by jahcs - 06-24-2005, 12:04 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by jahcs - 06-24-2005, 12:10 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Guest - 06-24-2005, 12:27 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-24-2005, 12:32 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Guest - 06-24-2005, 02:15 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by whyBish - 06-24-2005, 05:11 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-24-2005, 01:40 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-24-2005, 02:48 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by jahcs - 06-24-2005, 05:44 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-24-2005, 05:49 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-24-2005, 09:29 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by jahcs - 06-24-2005, 09:59 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-24-2005, 10:02 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-24-2005, 10:05 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Any1 - 06-24-2005, 10:55 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-24-2005, 11:06 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-25-2005, 02:41 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-25-2005, 03:16 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by whyBish - 06-27-2005, 07:16 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by whyBish - 06-29-2005, 04:50 AM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by Doc - 06-29-2005, 12:42 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by jahcs - 06-29-2005, 03:56 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by jahcs - 06-29-2005, 07:31 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by jahcs - 06-29-2005, 10:07 PM
Supreme Court ok's Property Seizures - by whyBish - 07-01-2005, 05:13 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)