05-30-2005, 02:56 PM
Darian,May 30 2005, 03:42 PM Wrote:Actually, it clearly mentions "just bought a license," with the main key word being "just." It's very helpful to take an entire sentence within its own context rather than nitpicking a word which is sort of semantically null.
I quoted and commented on your whole section of text (in the first post). You then posted saying you had not mentioned license to use, so I quoted more specifically and now you say I should not have done that???????
Darian,May 30 2005, 03:42 PM Wrote: When you purchase a software license, just what is it you think you're licensing it for? To NOT use?
You purchases a copy of the software, there is no need for any license at all to use it (although a whole lot of software makers want you to believe so, but please feel free to find in the copyright law were there is a requirement for it or any place that makes it not possible to use software without a license or permision from the copyright holder. That is all I have pointed out.
Darian,May 30 2005, 03:42 PM Wrote:Of course, that's not even relevant, as your argument's actually incorrect; as the copyright owner, Microsoft can most certainly license the use of their software as a condition for distributing the software to a consumer
Again you are mentioning "license to use". There is no need for such a thing to use software though. If I have bought or otherwise got hold of the software (in most countries in a legal way) I can use it at will without needing a license at all since there is nothing that forbids me to do it to start with!!! If you know about such a thing in any copyright law (or other law) feel free to point it out since it would be interesting to know about it.
There are three types of people in the world. Those who can count and those who can't.