05-30-2005, 02:42 PM
Jarulf,May 30 2005, 09:55 AM Wrote:The quote contained among other things:
"Obviously, Microsoft wants nothing to do with this view of things, so they accept the second view: "I just bought a license to use Windows XP. "
Which clearly mentiones "license to use".[right][snapback]78931[/snapback][/right]
Actually, it clearly mentions "just bought a license," with the main key word being "just." It's very helpful to take an entire sentence within its own context rather than nitpicking a word which is sort of semantically null. When you purchase a software license, just what is it you think you're licensing it for? To NOT use?
Of course, that's not even relevant, as your argument's actually incorrect; as the copyright owner, Microsoft can most certainly license the use of their software as a condition for distributing the software to a consumer -- because the method of distribution is completely under the control of the copyright holder. That's why there's legal boilerplate on every piece of software you've ever purchased which basically says, "You agree that you're only purchasing a license to use this software." And I'm pretty sure Bill Gates didn't get rich hiring dummies to work in his legal department.
Hope you understood me better now.
Darian Redwin - just some dude now