05-11-2005, 05:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-11-2005, 05:10 PM by Jeunemaitre.)
jahcs,May 11 2005, 10:59 AM Wrote:Good point, Occhi. But the geometric effect is often more pronounced in certain examples of the species:
(Money) exponent (Time)
Jeunemaitre has a good point too. What X equals changes randomly based on a woman's mood, is unknown by men, and is often viewed as irrational by outsiders. Most women would also say that we, as men, are imagining things so I would say Xi is the proper notation.
:D
[right][snapback]76975[/snapback][/right]
I was tempted to put forth that x represented a "feminine constant" but then realized the oxymoronic nature of that hypothesis. I have a feeling that jahcs may have something here though. I'm not sure whether the entirety of x is imaginary, but you've got me convinced that at least some of the terms in that quantity are linked to √-1. The question is what polynomials were factored to generate these terms, and how can we describe the interaction of some of these imaginary terms?
[ducks and covers] :ph34r:
edit: freakin' spelling mistakes
ah bah-bah-bah-bah-bah-bah-bob
dyah ah dah-dah-dah-dah-dah-dah-dah-dth
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
dyah ah dah-dah-dah-dah-dah-dah-dah-dth
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee