02-15-2005, 02:48 AM
[wcip]Angel,Feb 14 2005, 06:21 PM Wrote:Well, we then need to define "save movies". If the term indicates the success of the actor playing the protagonist, in terms of earning vast amounts of cash and the ability to land similar gigs for identical movies, then sure, but if we try to include any level of quality in a movie that has been "saved", then we best not hold our breaths.
[right][snapback]68082[/snapback][/right]
"Quality" is a purely subjective term when applied to art. One man's trash is another man's treasure. Perhaps quality art stands the test of time, making a longterm impact. Quality entertainment, on the other hand, could only have to stand the customer satisfaction test. If people continue to pay for movies with the same formula over and over again, then clearly said movies are sufficiently entertaining.