02-03-2005, 01:43 AM
Nystul,Feb 2 2005, 02:06 PM Wrote:I see the ban on prostitution as being part of the safety net, itself. Obviously, any workplace regulation won't apply if your employer chooses to ignore it, and never gets prosecuted.
[right][snapback]66979[/snapback][/right]
I'm guessing your opinion is that prostitution bans are safety nets because by making it illegal, less people are allowed to go into prostitution so it protects them from possible problems it might cause. If it's something else, explain.
Problem is, that doesn't seem to work well as a safety net, it seems ot do the opposite. Other suggestions for dealing with prostitution seem to work better in general. So allowing prostitution and putting some protection laws to it isn't actually causing any possible set-ups for less worker protection, it's a set-up for better laws elsewhere.
I may be dead, but I'm not old (source: see lavcat)
The gloves come off, I'm playing hardball. It's fourth and 15 and you're looking at a full-court press. (Frank Drebin in The Naked Gun)
Some people in forums do the next best thing to listening to themselves talk, writing and reading what they write (source, my brother)
The gloves come off, I'm playing hardball. It's fourth and 15 and you're looking at a full-court press. (Frank Drebin in The Naked Gun)
Some people in forums do the next best thing to listening to themselves talk, writing and reading what they write (source, my brother)