02-03-2005, 01:13 AM
I heard about this on Mal'Ganis weeks ago. And it was just for fun.
I don't know why anyone would protest like this, it's just going to annoy Blizzard and make them spiteful.
Warriors are pound for pound less able to deal out damage than rogues. This is the single defining point of every complaint against warriors. And it's ridiculous.
Do people want warriors in groups? Yes.
Do warriors have unique, in demand skills? Yes.
Is all the high level loot earned in raids, ie in groups? Yes.
Do people reject having endless rogues while searching for warriors? Yes.
Given all that, as "gimped" as warriors are, the complaints are from people who don't do high level content and are unhappy they can't "solo" as well as rogues. Well la dee da. I hope for some fixes to the warrior BUGS, but people who want them to deal out more than rogues are insane and stupid.
I don't know why anyone would protest like this, it's just going to annoy Blizzard and make them spiteful.
Artega,Jan 29 2005, 06:14 PM Wrote:Warriors are not gimped. We could use some love, sure, but we are NOT gimped, and actions like this aren't going to befriend Blizzard.Heh.
[right][snapback]66688[/snapback][/right]
Warriors are pound for pound less able to deal out damage than rogues. This is the single defining point of every complaint against warriors. And it's ridiculous.
Do people want warriors in groups? Yes.
Do warriors have unique, in demand skills? Yes.
Is all the high level loot earned in raids, ie in groups? Yes.
Do people reject having endless rogues while searching for warriors? Yes.
Given all that, as "gimped" as warriors are, the complaints are from people who don't do high level content and are unhappy they can't "solo" as well as rogues. Well la dee da. I hope for some fixes to the warrior BUGS, but people who want them to deal out more than rogues are insane and stupid.
My other mount is a Spiderdrake