All of this is "Conspiracy Theory" in my opinion.
Also according to the very first post, Pindelskin has worse drop chances in 1.10. This isn't true, AFAIK. If TCs (treasureclasses) are linked, the highest Unique/Set/Rare/Magic values of all 'linked' rows will be the ones that are used, so for Pindelskin we would have:
X = Act 5 (H) Super C, Unique = 512, Set = 654, Rare = 972, Mag = 1024
Y = Act 5 (H) Uitem C, Unique = 800, Set = 800, Rare = 800, Mag = 1024
MAX(X, Y) = Unique = 800, Set = 800, Rare = 972, Mag = 1024 <= like any other SuperUnique
The funny thing here: the "Super A/B/C" TCs are effectifly useless :P
Also according to the very first post, Pindelskin has worse drop chances in 1.10. This isn't true, AFAIK. If TCs (treasureclasses) are linked, the highest Unique/Set/Rare/Magic values of all 'linked' rows will be the ones that are used, so for Pindelskin we would have:
X = Act 5 (H) Super C, Unique = 512, Set = 654, Rare = 972, Mag = 1024
Y = Act 5 (H) Uitem C, Unique = 800, Set = 800, Rare = 800, Mag = 1024
MAX(X, Y) = Unique = 800, Set = 800, Rare = 972, Mag = 1024 <= like any other SuperUnique
The funny thing here: the "Super A/B/C" TCs are effectifly useless :P