Gradual Reduction in MF Effectiveness

[Jeger]

1-4: 3u 2s 7r 0m
5-8: 2u 3s 7r 5m
9-12: 0u 2s 6r 3m
13-16: 2u 5s 7r 3m

The drops dip in the 3rd run, but it doesn't seem like much to me. Make what you want of it.

Well, since this is the only actual data we have, let me over-analyze it:

Uniques

Chance that the four sets should be ordered with the highest unique value in the first two entries, and the lowest unique value in the second:

(1/2) * (2/3) = 1/3

so if it were truly random, the data would look this bad 33% of the time. Not significant, but interesting.


Uniques and Sets

10 uniques and sets in the first group, 9 in the second. Chance that this occurs is exactly 50%. Not at all significant.

Obviously, we need more data. :P