02-21-2004, 01:20 AM
Smoketest,Feb 16 2004, 06:59 AM Wrote:Yeah, that's similar to the system I used for 1.09d mules (all with expanded stashes, cubes and char inventories for max storage capacity.)Interesting that you chose to interpret my response as "excuses". Consider these
Tenshi gave me various excuses for not supporting expanded stashes, none of which convinced me. I happen to use my expanded stash to the full, for gem and rune upgrading and so on. I added two rows to the character inventory because I disagree with Blizzard's decision to add charms without expanding inventory space. I don't abuse charms, but neither do I enjoy having my inventory space cut in half while using a few of them.
Ah well, what I do for now is re-organize my stash and inventory to match the default sizes before Saving and Exiting the game. Then I can safely use ATMA to move stuff to the external stash. It involves some effort and forethought, but it's still easier and more efficient than multi-instance muling, and I can still take advantage of the extra space between 'stashing' sessions.
1) The programming effort is done entirely by 1 person (for free)
2) The content for the character GUI is locked.
3) Any change at this point requires more effort than is justified when only one person wants a particular change which is easily accomodated by other features.
4) What you see in ATMA is as a result of more than a year of user input from gamers on other forums that I hang out with.
5) I have other things in R/L to deal with as ATMA is a minor hobby of mine
I really don't see how your personal disagreements with Blizzard policy should influence your choice to use ATMA or not.
--T