01-16-2004, 10:31 PM
Nice try - you know your talking gibberish, probably because you cant help it.
The main disunity in your dialectic is still there.
This isnt a debate about weapons in space, or about liberals vs. conservatives.
I reasonably called him "paranoid liberal" because he made a fantasic construct that forsaw the moon potentially being used as a weapon.
It is a historically liberal perspective to be against playing the weapon "trump" game.
It was paranoid because the idea is absurd, as the moon is a terrible weapon base for nukes.
What I said was as simple as that.
If he had said we "should be putting nukes on the moon" - then I would have called him a stupid conservative(or maybe hawk).
For what ever reason, you made sense at all.
The main disunity in your dialectic is still there.
This isnt a debate about weapons in space, or about liberals vs. conservatives.
I reasonably called him "paranoid liberal" because he made a fantasic construct that forsaw the moon potentially being used as a weapon.
It is a historically liberal perspective to be against playing the weapon "trump" game.
It was paranoid because the idea is absurd, as the moon is a terrible weapon base for nukes.
What I said was as simple as that.
If he had said we "should be putting nukes on the moon" - then I would have called him a stupid conservative(or maybe hawk).
For what ever reason, you made sense at all.