This sounds like a great idea!

[Lissa]

You mean, like this?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/15/politics/c...index.html

Tsk, tsk, your true colors are coming through, interwebs tough guy.

Oh and Lissa, I'm waiting for your answer, although I already know that it will be something like blah, blah, blah.... racist, homophobe, fascist. You know, the factual arguments that liberals pride themselves on so much.... oh, wai....

Why should I answer a question when it's obvious you're twisting it around. The point is Intent. If you couldn't figure out what was required, then:

1) You're obviously trying to just twist things for your own biased opinion.

2) You're too daft to understand what "Intent" means (even with the resources available on the internet from dictionary.com and websters.com).

3) Trolling as usual.

Likewise, you still don't get that this law is an anti-discrimination law, the same as you see in the US involving non-gender aspects (like race, creed, religion), it's just that Canada went the extra step and added gender into their anti-discrimination laws. But given your bigoted attitude, you would never see it this way.

I asked you a direct question, the answer to which you predictably failed to provide. I gave you a real life scenario which could easily happen, and which will by the new law in Trudenada be punishable by jail time. You avoided addressing it by insulting me and telling that I do not understand. This of course is a typical approach taken by the left. Factual argument is not something you choose to engage in, because you can't address it. All you have are slogans, accusations and rhetoric. All methods used very effectively by communists and now, the left... which in reality is just a shade away from real-life communism that has been practiced in certain unfortunate countries for the last 100 years.

Also, please explain to me why you say that I am trolling? Mind you, don't tell me why you *think* I'm trolling, but why you say it.

No, you jump to an extreme point. This law has always been a discrimination law. When was the last time you saw someone get thrown in jail for discrimination that wasn't tied to another crime that was punishable by jail time? You're question, if you want to look at just stating something isn't jail time worthy, it's fine worthy if the person involved presses charges unless your actions constituted a jail time offense as well (like telling said transgender person that they should be harmed instituting assault).

So, you are trolling, as much as you want to deny it. Everyone else in this thread has stated as such that your interpretation is trolling. It's what you do, it's what you enjoy.

And just as an aside, you have no clue was Agnostic means (per what you put in your title). If you truly knew what Agnostic meant you wouldn't have it there.

The reason everyone here disagrees with me, is simply because they and you are all basically either communists or at least the gentrified western version of communist. To put it simply. with a noted exception, none of you comprehend it. Naturally, people like you, people who seek to control thought, will never agree with me. I know that. It is not for you that I make these posts, it is for those who are unsure where they lean, really unsure. Not just say they are sort of in the middle, but really are. The rest of you are simply a lost cause.

As far as being agnostic..... I used to be an atheist, when I was very young and full of myself. Now, I'm just not sure. That is being agnostic.

As far as not knowing what a communist is.... LOL.

As far as being a christian extremist.... 3xLOL. Usually I do not respond to intellects of your stature, but I'll make an exception. I am half-jew, 1/4 ukranian and 1/4 german of a russian descent. My wife is a daughter of a holacaust survivor. Spending my 1st 13 years in the USSR, even if I had wanted to be religious, it would not be possible. The only religion that country knew was the religion of lib... errr... communism. Religion was strictly a severely punishable crime, opium for the people. This anti-organised religion mindframe is still with me and always will be. Leniin asked for less years to brainwash children, I had 13.

You people just don't get it and you never will. You are not the reason I post here. You are spoiled by your upbringing, by your leftist education and by your inability to see that the whole world does not see things the way you do. It is not the people of the US that need to learn to .... what is that idiotic sticker.... "coexist". It is those that want to control all of your actions and your very thoughts that live in the Middle East, Africa and certain parts of Asia.... and unfortunately these days, to a lesser degree here and in Europe. They only want to "coexist" with you as long as you do it on their terms. You would not like their terms, trust me.

And you just showed why you get the grief here that you get. You don't understand what it is to try and learn about other people's cultures. Yes, there are people around that world that are unwilling to learn about other cultures, but you're showing it in this post. I've been exposed to huge number of different cultures from where I've lived, where I've learned, where I've travelled, and who I've worked with. I sit down and try to learn about other people and I don't make a decision on someone based on stereotype that is believed of a specific culture.

I went to school with an Iranian, an Iraqi, an Egyptian, a Korean, a Japanese, a couple of Vietnamese, and several other countries while getting my Nuclear Engineering degree. I saw the stereotype people portrayed for each of these people and none of them acted anywhere near those stereotypes. I've worked with several Vietnamese, Hispanics (Mexicans, Guatamalans, Puerto Ricans, and others), Africans, African Americans, Middle Easterners, Various Europeans, An Aussie, several Indians, a couple Pakistani, several Chinese, and others. I've travelled to Europe, South America, Mexico, and Canada. I've seen people act like the stereotypes, but I've also seen many more not.

You obviously haven't met that many people as you seem to stereotype people based on what you read of a select few without bothering to get to know people. You think that your bias is how everyone of that stereotype will act. You make a judgement before you even get to know the person you're dealing with. You and people like you are the problem we have so many problems in this world. You jump to a conclusion based on your bias without first trying to find out more information. You pull your information from the locations that confirm you bias without trying to find the information that might go against your bias.

You also don't understand what Agnostic means. There's more to it than religious context (which is why I know you don't understand it). The direct translation of Agnostic is without knowledge. So, it's more than just religion, it's also things like not taking an extreme position (which you take often), it is not being biased automatically towards something (like when dealing with a program that is platform Agnostic meaning it doesn't care what OS is the platform it will still run).

So, TLDR, you're biased, you don't like having your bias challenged, and will only look to information that confirms your bias and you think that anyone that possibly thinks different is a waste. You have a closed mind and are unwilling to try and open it.