The Great Global Warming Swindle

[Ashock]

How are there "sides" when, as Eppie correctly pointed out, that more than 97% of the scientific community agrees that climate change/global warming is for real? That isn't sides, that is an overwhelming general consensus.

How is it that over 95% of college professors in the Lib Arts departments all over the country are "progressives"? And it's not like the science departments are the reverse. Just not quiet as lopsided.

Scientist think in facts, that's the difference. Scientists are taught to be skeptical of things and only make a determination when observations and facts fit the hypothesis. Scientists that jump to a gut reaction are ridiculed by their fellow scientists. If you can't prove it with data, you won't be listened to.

Indeed and there's two sets of data. One promoted by those in power and one that is not. Scientists as a group are also extremely naive and easily manipulated by politicians.

Even before I did a bit of digging years ago about the whole Global Warming craze, I thought that it was illogical that human beings can be responsible for something like that, simply because we are not significant enough and also because earth's history has had numerous shifts in temperature in the past, before we became industrialized.

What I've found, answered my questions, fully. So you have your set of data, I have mine. I feel that yours is manipulated and just because it is widely propagated, it does not make it valid.

I bet you that in 10 years, this fad will be over with. It's already dying out bit by bit.

I also find it interesting that the proponents of this re-distribution of wealth masked as concerned citizens of the world, cause this:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/pa...-1.2450920

You'd think that they practiced what they preached, but no... that's not the liberal way.