Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius -- CU revisited
#14
(04-13-2014, 09:33 AM)Hammerskjold Wrote: If you have trouble understanding why some people can think a company investing in a product it claims it's against, might be seen as hypocritical.
...
What happens if I say my religion and belief is the worship of Odin Allfather, wielder of Gugnir, his son Thor wielder of Mjolnir and Mother Goddess Freya?
There is quite a difference between HL choosing to invest in Merck, and HL offering their employees options to invest in 401K funds which of the 200+ companies invested happen to also contain (at this particular time) Merck. This is a very, very indirect consequential support of Merck's product.

As I understand it, HL is not against all contraceptives. I understand their beliefs are against the use of abortifaciants.

And, on your advocacy of Asatru, did you see the SCOTUS ruling on Cutter v. Wilkinson?
”There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." - Hamlet (1.5.167-8), Hamlet to Horatio.

[Image: yVR5oE.png][Image: VKQ0KLG.png]

Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius -- CU revisited - by kandrathe - 04-13-2014, 03:02 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)