05-23-2013, 06:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-23-2013, 06:51 PM by FireIceTalon.)
Yea, you quote a free-market advocate to try and offset what I said, when such an advocate will obviously present capitalism in the same way that I was critiquing Shoju for, so that it is presented with its own agenda - thanks for helping me prove my point! You fail epically, as usual, Kandrathe.
My statements aren't assumptions, they are observations made because of his clear separation of capitalism from political and social problems, and thus capitalism being viewed as not a totality, is implied in his method of thinking; for example when he viewed the way countries interact with one another as being the cause of the problem, as if this is a separate entity or process from capitalism (it isn't). Your and his thinking treats these things as being separate from one another, when they clearly are not - they are very much interrelated and interact with one another.
Also, trying to use a website supposedly hosted by a Marxist that supposedly rejects DM doesn't really help your cause either. Gee, his word must be the gospel!! Considering Dialectical thought is the backbone behind Marxist thought, and to reject it, in my opinion, is about as anti-Marxist as you can get. Fuck that guy, and his site. He's probably some social-democrat trying to pose as a radical to look cool for all his hipster friends, and from reading the jargon on this site, he clearly has no understanding of Marxism, yet claims to be one. Anti-dialectics not only abandons Marxism, but also life and society in general. The guy even used your other quote from that capitalist on his site, and hes claiming to be a Marxist? All I can say is....BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
My statements aren't assumptions, they are observations made because of his clear separation of capitalism from political and social problems, and thus capitalism being viewed as not a totality, is implied in his method of thinking; for example when he viewed the way countries interact with one another as being the cause of the problem, as if this is a separate entity or process from capitalism (it isn't). Your and his thinking treats these things as being separate from one another, when they clearly are not - they are very much interrelated and interact with one another.
Also, trying to use a website supposedly hosted by a Marxist that supposedly rejects DM doesn't really help your cause either. Gee, his word must be the gospel!! Considering Dialectical thought is the backbone behind Marxist thought, and to reject it, in my opinion, is about as anti-Marxist as you can get. Fuck that guy, and his site. He's probably some social-democrat trying to pose as a radical to look cool for all his hipster friends, and from reading the jargon on this site, he clearly has no understanding of Marxism, yet claims to be one. Anti-dialectics not only abandons Marxism, but also life and society in general. The guy even used your other quote from that capitalist on his site, and hes claiming to be a Marxist? All I can say is....BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/user/FireIceTalon
"Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class, made into law for all, a will whose essential character and direction are determined by the economic conditions of the existence of your class." - Marx (addressing the bourgeois)
"Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class, made into law for all, a will whose essential character and direction are determined by the economic conditions of the existence of your class." - Marx (addressing the bourgeois)