01-17-2013, 10:39 AM
So but what about criminals who have served their time in prison. Why does the 2nd amandment not go for them, and the mentally ill? Who are we to deny them the right to defend themselves. In other words we do think that certain 'conditions' are so important we just forget about the 2nd amandment.
To take this a step further. The militia groups of crazies who think their government is after them. To me they are a risk group that could become violent, and so should not have access to guns.....however they are probably the strongest opponents of regulation.
The few posts about size of weapons were all wrong anyway. Let's not forget that 'the army' in the days the 2nd amandment was made did not own automatic weapons, kevlar suits, tanks, guided missile etc.
So if the 2nd amandment is your argument you should also allow the public to buy bigger stuff. Everybody know you don't stand a chance with a simple 6-shooter against armored vehicles patrolling your streets.
So or you agree with me that the 2nd amandment is really outdated and makes as much sense as literally following the bible or you don't agree and think it is really necesarry to defend yourself, but then you should also be consequent and allow bigger weapons to be bought.
Anyway nothing will change, the NRA and weapon industry can write extra good profits every time something awful happens because gun sales go through the roof and it is always best just to trust big and powerful cooperations. (who interestingly enough are the ones that sell guns to the army that all those 2 amandment nutters are afraid off).
To take this a step further. The militia groups of crazies who think their government is after them. To me they are a risk group that could become violent, and so should not have access to guns.....however they are probably the strongest opponents of regulation.
The few posts about size of weapons were all wrong anyway. Let's not forget that 'the army' in the days the 2nd amandment was made did not own automatic weapons, kevlar suits, tanks, guided missile etc.
So if the 2nd amandment is your argument you should also allow the public to buy bigger stuff. Everybody know you don't stand a chance with a simple 6-shooter against armored vehicles patrolling your streets.
So or you agree with me that the 2nd amandment is really outdated and makes as much sense as literally following the bible or you don't agree and think it is really necesarry to defend yourself, but then you should also be consequent and allow bigger weapons to be bought.
Anyway nothing will change, the NRA and weapon industry can write extra good profits every time something awful happens because gun sales go through the roof and it is always best just to trust big and powerful cooperations. (who interestingly enough are the ones that sell guns to the army that all those 2 amandment nutters are afraid off).