03-30-2012, 07:41 PM
(03-30-2012, 07:18 PM)eppie Wrote:
(03-30-2012, 05:44 PM)Tal Wrote:(03-30-2012, 09:59 AM)AngryCommie Wrote: While I am generally in favor of free speech (especially against government and political institutions or corporations), certain types of hate speech, in particular those of a racist, sexist, religious, or discriminatory nature toward gays/lesbians or disabled individuals should NOT be protected under any circumstances.
What a slippery slope. Who gets to determine exactly what is hate speech in that context?
Well it isn't really. If a constitution says all people are equal independent of their skin colour, sexual preference or religion it is not a stretch to not allow people to make hateful remarks about this.
So if I say "I don't like Catholics" - is that hate speech? Or a comedian makes the tired joke about Catholic Priests and little boys that upsets someone - should the comedian be beaten as AngryCommie contends?
You can't take the Potter Stewart Rule of Pornography (I know it when I see it) and use it for outlawing hate speech. It goes against the intentions of the First Amendment.