09-17-2010, 01:00 PM
(09-17-2010, 08:26 AM)Jester Wrote: But we haven't heard from them yet.I found another bit from the 9th circuit.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/me...-30427.pdf
It does not dispute the facts as they've been laid out. The EPA's position was that storing the materials for two years presented a danger. That the materials were waste materials, and not useful chemicals temporarily set aside.