05-27-2010, 11:21 PM
Hi,
I believe that Lissa's point is that if NK launches a surprise attack, and if they use the correct tactics, then they can negate most of SK's advantages. If, OTOH, they simply roll tanks and troops across the DMZ, then SK would have the advantage.
I suspect that, if NK thought they could pull off a surprise, they'd use tactics very much as Lissa outlined. What I doubt is that they can pull off a surprise, or even that they think they can. Both sides are on hair trigger, and I suspect SK knows and goes to maximum alert every time a NK general hits the head at an unusual hour.
As to what would actually happen, I wouldn't care to guess. I doubt there is enough information in the public sector to game the possible scenarios. Short of actually going to war, that would be the only way to answer the question.
--Pete
(05-27-2010, 10:56 PM)Alliera Wrote: Why is tactics an issue? Both sides can employ tactics.
I believe that Lissa's point is that if NK launches a surprise attack, and if they use the correct tactics, then they can negate most of SK's advantages. If, OTOH, they simply roll tanks and troops across the DMZ, then SK would have the advantage.
I suspect that, if NK thought they could pull off a surprise, they'd use tactics very much as Lissa outlined. What I doubt is that they can pull off a surprise, or even that they think they can. Both sides are on hair trigger, and I suspect SK knows and goes to maximum alert every time a NK general hits the head at an unusual hour.
As to what would actually happen, I wouldn't care to guess. I doubt there is enough information in the public sector to game the possible scenarios. Short of actually going to war, that would be the only way to answer the question.
--Pete
How big was the aquarium in Noah's ark?