Twinking, HC, SC...my thoughts

[Taem]

Twinking isn't based on the levels of the characters involved.

I think most people agree that it is the availability of the item that would define an act as twinking. So in his case, it's not twinking. Any of his characters have access to those earlier playing areas, and so have access to items found therein.

I certainly don't agree

Putting a full Sigon's set on a level 25 character is definitely twinking, imo

IMO, the definition would be
moving items or gold from one character to a second so as to give that second character a play advantage

I've never seen a level 45 gaze/shaft/buriza zon claiming to be no-twink either ;)

But then by the time you *do* acquire all the pieces to a Sigons set if you *only* keep the items found on a single character, that set will be utterly useless to you because your level will far exceed its benefits. This is unless you trade, which brings up that whole moral issue of trading on battle.net in regards to the level/trustworthiness of the MF'er who found the item in question (since you consider *twinking* to yourself to be unfair, how unfair is it that most likely some 99th level botter found the item your looking for and wants only chipped gems?). I guess this makes set items useless and pointless from that standpoint.