10-24-2006, 06:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-24-2006, 06:13 PM by oldmandennis.)
Quote:I like the idea of class/raid role leaders writing up reports. Even without scores I think people will be much more focussed if their contribution is discussed. And a lot of the people who don't try are pretty blatant/stupid about it. Eg He's not that great, he only beat me cos he uses potions
In our guild, this works a lot better when you have a class hiarchy. We even have seperate voice chat channels for the different classes. To the maximum extent possible, general complaints and concerns are discussed amongst the class, and if something needs to be said the leader says it to the other class leader. For example, we usually assign shamans to mages during AOE. It's much better for the shaman leader to say "OldMan, your mage went down. Keep those heals hotter", then it is for the mages to start going "Shaman suck" - "Well if we had AI we could keep you up" - "We didn't have time to do it, the noob hunters pulled too soon"... blah blah blah. It stops medium sized things from becoming bigger, while still reinforcing better play.
Quote:I do think that we can get away with awarding the Player of the Month within each class/raid role an item.
Not a bad idea.
Quote:How about the idea of raid roles rather than classes? It was frustrating as a Feral Druid to be strongly encouraged to make way for dps warriors in crap greens. I'd rather have signed up as a tank, be prioritised for tank loot but not healer loot, than have signed up as a Druid and been prioritised for healer loot I didn't want.
I'm not sure what the problem is as far as loot goes. There aren't a whole lot of items which would be conflicted between druids and warriors. All the armor is out, weapons are out, rings you should go for ones with armor that are usually not wanted by warriors... neck back and trinkets are worth making a fuss over?