California Law

[Occhidiangela]

I'm sorry Occhi, but I missed the part where I said that anal rape was fine as long as a condom was used.

OK, here it was.

There comes a point when legislating or punishing behaviour, no matter how severly, stops having an impact. Taking steps to make that behaviour safer, on the other hand, can make a real, significant, measurable difference.

That says to me that you don't think you can stop anal rape in prison, so you want to condone it, even though it is a felonious crime against persons, and then your remark seems to say that all is well so long as the evolution is made safer.

Hell, gekko, why stop at rape? Make murder safer. Ensure people hold their heads still so the gunman can get the nice, clean, humane head shot. Makes it safer, ya see, since the gunman only has to shoot once and there is less likelihood of collateral injury to bystanders. Starting now, make sure you hold your head still, to ensure that if someone wants to shoot you, it is a nice, safe evolution.

Back to the original scenario: If you were "sexually active" with the mythical "Jake" in this little vignette, the details would most likely include his forcing his loving, carnal attentions on your backside. For some reason, I don't think you integrated that contextual clue into your response to my rather cynical remark.

Occhi