06-06-2006, 08:26 PM
I don't want to touch any part of this thread with a 10 foot pole [Child porn is bad, and Lurker Lounge has burn out the subject of separation of church and state about 3 years ago. There, I'm done.], but somehow I found this quip from the linked story too funny to pass up:
So to recap, the party thinks child pornography is only OK if you hunt down the children and shoot them yourself? We definitely wouldn't want someone to profit off of what should be a personal obsession.
Or perhaps the party is full of old perverts who are willing to sacrifice the happiness of future perverts in order to guarantee continued access to their existing stash. Talk about selfish!
Quote:The party wants private possession of child pornography to be allowed although it supports the ban on the trade of such materials.
So to recap, the party thinks child pornography is only OK if you hunt down the children and shoot them yourself? We definitely wouldn't want someone to profit off of what should be a personal obsession.
Or perhaps the party is full of old perverts who are willing to sacrifice the happiness of future perverts in order to guarantee continued access to their existing stash. Talk about selfish!